Jeff
Tue May 03 18:55:07 CDT 2005
Thank you for your prompt response Matt
I can see an advantage in using a microsoft product for integration with the
rest of the suite. I will find a partner in wellington NZ to get more
detailed advice
"MattNC" wrote:
> I'm not familiar with Legrand, but I would definitely say that ACT 6.0 is not
> going to deliver the kind of tools you are looking for. Microsoft CRM's
> Customer Service module will give you a way to handle jobs or projects and
> track the time using a CRM "case." Cases are linked to associated customers
> (contacts or accounts). However, if you are only going to have 3 users, you
> will want to have a partner show you a demo of CRM so you can understand the
> shortfalls in the current version and decide if you can live with them.
> (Version 2 is supposed to come out in the 4th quarter and will include
> service-call scheduling and more marketing functions.) CRM will also require
> customization to fit your workflow, services which a partner could do for
> you, but which may be a little pricey for a three-user installation.
> --
> Matt Wittemann
>
http://icu-mscrm.blogspot.com
>
>
> "Jeff Owens" wrote:
>
> > I want to purchase and use a CRM as the centre of my small business, and am
> > looking for the right product. Currently comparing Microsoft CRM, legrand
> > and ACT! 6.0 (been told to avoid 7 at this stage)
> > Criteria:
> > About to install Microsoft small business server incl outlook 2003, up to
> > three users
> > Could have up to 1000 clients and potential clients, accumulating several
> > thousand 'jobs'. Focus is not on aggressive marketing as I have enough work
> > coming in; rather I want efficient management of jobs through a flexible work
> > tracking process.
> > Work tracking is crucial, with linkages from jobs to client records,
> > referrals, time recording. Calendar, documents, emails, accounting package if
> > possible.
> > Synchronisation with imate JAM running windows mobile 2003 and activesync etc
> > Any recommendations, or where can I go for guidance?
> >