Alright, everyone has posted different slow CRM questions. Mine will
be extremely specific.

My organization runs CRM 3.0 with a pretty good sized database, size in
my opinion should not matter, remember infinite scalability? Primarily
with the Outlook 2003 add-in. Alright so they have an 'Offline Client',
usually that means you'll be running on a laptop, or atleast that is
how it is here. With 1.4 GHz and 1 Gig of memory exactly how does MS
expect people to support a MS SQL server locally?

It pegs the CPU, makes outlook a hog and the machine is virtually
useless until 2-5 minutes after boot, and Outlook is slow even after
completing the boot process. Both the sqlserver process and the helper
process peg the cpu at different times. My question is, how do we make
these laptops, with these necessary CRM apps on them, run at a
reasonable pace. Is there some way to improve efficiency, or lower
priority of the sqlserver, but my thought is that would only slow
Outlook queries even more.

So I guess the mobile/offline version of CRM makes a decent small form
laptop useless. MS recommends going SQL32 on the server, but offline
that won't stop the cpu from going to 100%, also increasing memory
won't get the cpu to run more cycles so these fixes are BS.

We can't be (and I am sure are not) the only people with this issue and
MS still doesn't believe that it is as slow as it is. Do they test in
a high-end environment for 25 minutes and then say we are ready to
ship? I mean how did they not see that 'mobile laptops + sql server !=
good idea'.

Seriously any solutions or ideas would be more than appreciated.

Re: MS SQL Server takes 100% cpu by Matt

Matt
Fri Apr 21 09:33:24 CDT 2006

How much data is the average user taking offline? This will have the iggest
impact on the machine's response. If the user isnt actively using CRM, then
SQL shouldn't be doing anything on the machine and should not be pulling
that much CPU. How big is the MSDE DB on the machine?

Also, how large is the users mailbox? That seems to have the biggest impact
on the outlook client.

--

Matt Parks
MVP - Microsoft CRM


<jcarlock105@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1145562710.115533.123510@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Alright, everyone has posted different slow CRM questions. Mine will
be extremely specific.

My organization runs CRM 3.0 with a pretty good sized database, size in
my opinion should not matter, remember infinite scalability? Primarily
with the Outlook 2003 add-in. Alright so they have an 'Offline Client',
usually that means you'll be running on a laptop, or atleast that is
how it is here. With 1.4 GHz and 1 Gig of memory exactly how does MS
expect people to support a MS SQL server locally?

It pegs the CPU, makes outlook a hog and the machine is virtually
useless until 2-5 minutes after boot, and Outlook is slow even after
completing the boot process. Both the sqlserver process and the helper
process peg the cpu at different times. My question is, how do we make
these laptops, with these necessary CRM apps on them, run at a
reasonable pace. Is there some way to improve efficiency, or lower
priority of the sqlserver, but my thought is that would only slow
Outlook queries even more.

So I guess the mobile/offline version of CRM makes a decent small form
laptop useless. MS recommends going SQL32 on the server, but offline
that won't stop the cpu from going to 100%, also increasing memory
won't get the cpu to run more cycles so these fixes are BS.

We can't be (and I am sure are not) the only people with this issue and
MS still doesn't believe that it is as slow as it is. Do they test in
a high-end environment for 25 minutes and then say we are ready to
ship? I mean how did they not see that 'mobile laptops + sql server !=
good idea'.

Seriously any solutions or ideas would be more than appreciated.



RE: MS SQL Server takes 100% cpu by JeffMetcalf

JeffMetcalf
Sat Apr 22 19:12:01 CDT 2006

You seem shocked that MS would actually test anything in the real world, lol.
Having administered Great Plains and CRM for a while...I can tell you they
haven't got a clue what really happens in the small business world, and they
don't test jack.

"jcarlock105@gmail.com" wrote:

> Alright, everyone has posted different slow CRM questions. Mine will
> be extremely specific.
>
> My organization runs CRM 3.0 with a pretty good sized database, size in
> my opinion should not matter, remember infinite scalability? Primarily
> with the Outlook 2003 add-in. Alright so they have an 'Offline Client',
> usually that means you'll be running on a laptop, or atleast that is
> how it is here. With 1.4 GHz and 1 Gig of memory exactly how does MS
> expect people to support a MS SQL server locally?
>
> It pegs the CPU, makes outlook a hog and the machine is virtually
> useless until 2-5 minutes after boot, and Outlook is slow even after
> completing the boot process. Both the sqlserver process and the helper
> process peg the cpu at different times. My question is, how do we make
> these laptops, with these necessary CRM apps on them, run at a
> reasonable pace. Is there some way to improve efficiency, or lower
> priority of the sqlserver, but my thought is that would only slow
> Outlook queries even more.
>
> So I guess the mobile/offline version of CRM makes a decent small form
> laptop useless. MS recommends going SQL32 on the server, but offline
> that won't stop the cpu from going to 100%, also increasing memory
> won't get the cpu to run more cycles so these fixes are BS.
>
> We can't be (and I am sure are not) the only people with this issue and
> MS still doesn't believe that it is as slow as it is. Do they test in
> a high-end environment for 25 minutes and then say we are ready to
> ship? I mean how did they not see that 'mobile laptops + sql server !=
> good idea'.
>
> Seriously any solutions or ideas would be more than appreciated.
>
>

Re: MS SQL Server takes 100% cpu by Mr

Mr
Sun Apr 23 01:43:24 CDT 2006

How many contacts did the user have in outlook prior to starting to use
CRM?

Do they have lot of e-mails in their inbox / Sent items?

Did they import their outlook contacts into CRM?