Problem of SubReport

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ Crm
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - Connector With Dynamics Nav in CRM 4.0 We are planning to implement CRM 4.0 and upgrade Dyn Nav into version 5.1. I can't find any documentation on an earlier statement * from microsoft that CRM 4.0 would include pre-build connections for appl. within MS Dyn Family. Someone knows the answer? Peter * "In enterprise environments, Microsoft offers CRM connectors into leading ERP applications, including those from PeopleSoft, Oracle and SAP. It also provides pre-built connections for ERP applications within the Microsoft Dynamics family." Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93597
  - 2
    - Campaign Response - Form Assistant Hi When entering campaign responses, and a user clicks on the customer lookup field the form assistant defaults to accounts. I want this to default to contacts. is this possible and how do i go about this please? Kind Regards Ridhima Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93594
  - 3
    - M,I`5'Perse cution BB C Newsc asters Lie & Deny T heyre Wa tching Me MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters Lie. & Deny They're Watching Me Central to the persecution campaign waged. against me for some nine years now by the Security Service is their use of. the media, and in particular the broadcast media, to make clear to me that. I am under surveillance and being watched within my own home, even. by BBC newscasters while they read the news. This is really an. act of arrogance; MI5 and their tools in the television and radio are so sure that they can never. be caught, that they have many times made explicity clear on. broadcast programmes that they are as capable of. seeing me as I am of seeing the broadcast pictures. Even when they have known I am taping the programmes. they still carry on this practice;. for examples of TVand radio presenters caught "in action", see the. Evidence area of my website. If you wish to reply to. this article...... then please include your. name and fax number! I provide the means for recipients. to send me their thoughts on the topics discussed, but ask that you provide me with your. fax number or email address if you require a response. Also would you please send not. more than one or two pages, if by fax.. Thank-you! It. started with a Newscaster, and it continues with Newscasters today The very first incident in the story started with a reaction by. an ITN newscaster, Sue Carpenter, in June of 1990,. almost nine years ago now. She reacted to what she. saw in my living room at home as she read the news. My mother. had brought an apple for me into the room, whereupon the newsreader smirked and giggled, apparently finding this. funny. I couldn't believe what I. was seeing. I carried on watching news and other television programmes to see if. presenters would show signs of "interactive watching"; to my surprise, this. happened again and again. Unfortunately, I did not have my wits sufficiently about me to. videotape these programmes, and it is now almost impossible to obtain recordings dating back. to 1990. However, I have been busy recording everything Ive watched the. last couple of years, and the taping has. yielded some nuggets, which you will find if you point your Web. browser at the "evidence" area of my website, whose URL address is given above. Strangely it is. not particularly the BBC who are "after me" at the. moment (with the exception of occasional fire from Nicholas Witchell), but that supposed. paragon of virtue and decency Jon Snow of. Channel Four TV News (he actually works for ITN), who once claimed hed turned down MI5s offer of a tax-free salary. I will cover. Snows recent actions in a future. article. BBCs. Hidden Shame The first ever Usenet post. (internet newsgroup article) on the subject of the MI5 bugging. / BBC watching occurred, as stated in a previous article, in early. May 1995. It is reproduced here; Date:. Thu May 4 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject: BBC's Hidden. Shame Remember the. two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched you back? Which. you could never get rid of, only the sound could be turned. down? Well the country which brought Orwell into the world has made. his nightmare follow into. the world after him. Since 1990 the British have been waging war against one of their own citizens. using surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign of. abuse in the transmitted media in their efforts to humiliate. their "victim". I suppose "BBCs Hidden. Shame" is more of a wish than a fact. It may be hidden, but the BBC and other media and security organisations seem. to have no shame whatever in their anti-social, not. to say criminal, actions. Nor do the general public, who seem quite happy to. parrot the vilest obscenities without. much hesitation or apparently thought. Martyn Lewis, Nicholas. Witchell and the rest Most of the harassment occurred in 1990-92, when I. wasnt making any recordings, and the BBC wont release copies of current. affairs programmes from that period..... so although I can remember there were many incidents in that. time, even many specifics, I cant dig up the actual programmes to flesh. out the bones. This year, there. has been at least one incident with Nicholas Witchell as newsreader,. which I have successfully recorded and digitized, i.e. converted into a computer. Quicktime movie file. This has not yet found its way onto. my website (Im a busy man, dontcha know) but you can be sure I will let the readership of these articles. know when that clip makes it onto the web. The Witchell clip was recorded on. Saturday 10 April 1999 at 7pm, and shows Witchell trying to restrain. his features from collapsing into a. smirk. First his upper lip quivers for several minutes, then with the non-excuse of a non-joke his entire face twists into a. grin. It looks as if he. finds me so funny, that he allows himself to submerge any pretence at professionalism in a. sea of MI5-inspired sarcasm and harassment. The two. BBC newscasters whose reactions to me I can remember most vividly over the years. are Martyn Lewis and Nicholas Witchell. I can remember thinking years ago. that Michael Buerk was also seeing me at home; and if the other two. are watching then there would be no reason why he wouldnt be doing the same; but in all. honesty I cannot remember a single clear instance of his. reacting through facial or verbal expression to me. I can remember several instances of Martyn Lewis reacting to what he. saw of me, however. In. early 1992 I was watching the BBC news with Lewis on a small black-and-white portable TV at my. then home in Oxford. I threw a term. of abuse at Lewis; he flinched, then gave a grin and made a comment from which I. understood that he had been on my side, but might have changed his mind as a. result of what Id just said to him. And in spring 1991 I remember Martyn. Lewis clearly reacting to what he saw of me at my then accommodation in Woking, Surrey, by continuing. to stare at some fixed point. near the camera after the news had finished - presumably this is where the. monitor interactively showing pictures of my room was. located. Why would BBC and other Newscasters Watch and Harass. Me, Watching Them? This is a very difficult question, and. I dont actually know the answer. It is a matter of record. that the Secret Services are very much part of the Establishment. The recent exposure of the "MI6 Agent. List" on the internet, and its coverage in the newspapers, reveals how much MI5. and MI6 are recruited from the ranks. of the Establishment. Obviously the relationship. is bi-directional; the Establishment influences MI5/MI6, but the secret services (well, perhaps not so secret now we know who works. for MI6!!!) also influence. the machinery of power and information dissemination i.e. media in this country. So they. must have a lot of covert. leverage with the BBC and ITN. Some of this leverage is obviously through bribery. It is. a matter of record that MI5 tried some years. ago to "buy" Jon Snow of Channel Four TV. He turned them down - obviously they must have approached other. media people as well, and from the lack of other. reports of people turning them down, it may be. presumed that some other journalists will have accepted the sugared carrots put before. them. Ironically, Jon Snow has been taking part in the recent "watching" actions against me - but why. he has allowed himself to be used by. the secret services is something which I do not know. Perhaps the Security Service. uses blackmail to twist arms of journalists into co-operating with them? I have always. thought there was something slightly odd about Martyn Lewiss demeanour. At the time of the Ron. Davies "rough trade" scandal it was. reported that MI5 had known all about Davies predilections and the sham of. his pretence to be a happily married man. Perhaps MI5. have been able to dig something up from Martyn Lewiss private life to blackmail him into acting on their behalf? And if. there wasnt anything before the "newscaster watching" started then. there most certainly is. something now.... once theyve started watching, the newscasters. will surely wish their activities to remain covered-up, and co-operate with the security. service. "Newscaster Watching" Deliberately. Constructed to Mimic Schizophrenia Presumably this is the first case. in history of television journalists actually taking part in acts of real-time,. live spying and reacting against one of their. viewers. What you have to understand, though, is that I was quite mentally healthy in June 1990, certainly. relative to November 1992, when after two and a. half years of harassment I was finally admitted to hospital as an out-patient. MI5 decided from the outset that. they would make me mad;. they constructed the media harassment to resemble what would be. reported by a person with mental illness; and then they carried on years of abuse to inflict on me the. condition which they wished to use as an excuse to cover up. their abuses. I sold my portable TV in autumn 1990. and stopped watching television regularly.. I realise now that this may have been a mistake. What I should have done was to watch TV. and listen to the radio, but tape-record everything. and make a note of what each excerpt meant to me. I would then be in a much stronger position as regards. to evidence that I am now. That is what I am trying. to do now, but unsurprisingly the TV/radio presenters have. stopped getting at me, now they know they are being recorded. When I started publicising my case on. internet newsgroups in 1995, I was met with the disbelief one. might expect to be accorded to a mentally ill person who talks about "newscaster watching". and media persecution. Some newsgroup participants thought I had started. a "troll", an invention made to. obtain a reaction; one bright spark even suggested a group of psychology students were behind. the articles. But most people thought the articles were symptomatic of derangement - and. that is exactly what MI5 want people to think. MI5 chose me as a target. because I was mildly mentally ill at the outset in 1990, although I stress my illness then. was very mild in comparison with. November 1992, and because they knew that enough abuse would (a) make me much. more seriously ill, and (b) once I was more ill, they would "get away" with a. harassment deliberately constructed to look like the symptoms. of paranoid schizophrenia. Martyn Lewis Denies & Lies, But Wont in. Writing In February 1997 I wrote to BBC Viewer &. Listener Correspondence and asked them to investigate the claim that. their newscasters had engaged in "real-time spying" on me. They replied. that they had asked Martyn Lewis and Michael. Buerk whether they had engaged in such practices, and that they had both made verbal denials to VLC, but. were refusing to put their denials in. writing. To me it looks as if Lewis. and Buerk are happy to lie verbally but not in writing, because. written falsehoods would place them unambiguously in the wrong, whereas they can try to talk their way out of. verbal lies if they are ever caught, or perhaps even deny the verbal lies. completely? If they lie without shame, then why would they. have any shame about future lies about. lying? BBC-VLC also said that the. BBC "would never engage in any form of surveillance activity" such as that described. Clearly. Martyn Lewis and the. rest have lied to their own organisations personnel about their criminal actions. So. much for the "objective", "truthful" BBC, a nest of shabby. liars. Summons against the BBC,. for Nuisance caused by Newscaster Spying In March 1997 I issued a civil summons against the BBC,. seeking injunction against further "newscaster spying", and token. damages for what the BBC had done to me until that date. The purpose of the summons was to try. to "smoke out". the BBC, since obviously I did not have good evidence which would be necessary for either a civil or. criminal case to be made against them. My summons was. worded as follows; 1. The plaintiff is and was at all material. times residing at [home address]. At. some time prior to or during June 1990, persons of unknown identity entered Plaintiff's premises and. installed concealed television equipment in said. premises. 2.. A campaign of harassment was launched against the Plaintiff by the persons of unknown identity, which in part. took the form of instigating harassment. by BBC TV newscasters (including specifically Michael Buerk and Martyn Lewis). as they read news bulletins, by making direct and personal comments. to Plaintiff. 3. The campaigns purpose was to subject Plaintiff to great mental. stress and induce mental. breakdown. As a result of it Plaintiff did indeed suffer from severe mental. strain in 1990-97. 4. In order to avoid the mental. strain being caused to him the Plaintiff has been compelled to stop watching BBC TV news. Defendant. therefore committed the tort of private nuisance, since normal use of. home was interfered. with. 5. Plaintiff claims a permanent. injunction prohibiting further nuisance, and damages for nuisance suffered limited. to 5,000. Naturally, my attempt to smoke-out. the BBC and its lying newscasters failed. The. BBCs litigation department sought to have my summons struck out;. and they succeeded in doing so, on the grounds of my action "disclosing no reasonable cause of action".. I was also prevented from issuing. further civil claims against the BBC without leave of the Court. Apparently litigants-in-person frequently / usually have. their claims struck. out with this wording, regardless of the merit of their claims. BBC Suppresses my Claims. of "Watching by Newscasters" BBCs staff magazine Ariel ran my advert "BBC Newsreaders. Spying on my home" for one issue. in the Personal category on 8/July/1997 before it was spotted. and axed by editor Robin Reynolds; please see webpage;. http://www.pair.com/spook/evidence/plaint/ariel.htm Clearly the BBC will not allow claims. of its wrongdoing to be made public in. the media channels it controls. On. several occasions people said to my face that harassment from the TV was happening. On the first day I worked. in Oxford, I spent the evening in the local pub the Rose and Crown with. the company's technical director Ian, and Phil,. another employee. Ian made a few references to me and said to. Phil, as if in an aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which Phil. replied, "Yes, I think so". The reader might think that mere "watching" by newscasters etc might. be a relatively benign happening. But it is not; it. is part of MI5s framework of harassment and lies. On many occasions. the reactions of the BBCs newscasters to me has been in. the nature of sarcasm, implicit contempt and abuse. This is visible in Witchells news programme mentioned. above, where he engages in abuse by laughing at me during his newsreading. It. was particularly visible in the early. period of 1990-92, and as late as Autumn 1993, when during a Newsnight broadcast. Jeremy Paxman interviewed a football person about soccer hooliganism, and the. interviewee gave vent to an unsubtle rant about "theyre idiots, theyre just idiots, keep. up the surveillance". Paxman started grinning, showing. he understood and was taking part. in the abuse being perpetrated on that programme. Conclusion The MI5 Persecution started with harassment. by television newscasters, and today harassment by. TV and radio presenters still forms a key part of MI5s activities against me. When this. business started in June 1990 I was in relatively good health of mind.. Years of persecution by the secret police and their mouthpieces in the state-run. BBC and other media eroded my health until MI5 achieved their aim of seeing me rendered mentally ill. in November. 1992. The diagnosis which was forced on me unfortunately and ironically meant that my reports of. the harassment are disregarded, because the. mentally ill are second-class citizens in todays Britain. Yet. TV and radio harassment continues, albeit in a reduced form, despite my taping all the programmes I watch, resulting in my being. able to obtain and demonstrate objectively on the website instances. of media presenters attacking me. Unfortunately these recorded instances are quite. tenuous; I might understand them, the presenters understand what it is theyre. doing, but despite. many thousands of people knowing the truth of the "newscaster watching", the omerta continues and they continue. to refuse to admit the truth of the. matter. It is a terrible indictment of British society that there is not even one decent person willing to speak out. I. look forward to. the day when the truth does finally emerge, and the mass corruption which has. allowed the MI5 persecution to take place is finally purged and the Establishment criminals caught and. appropriately punished. 5289 Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93593
  - 4
    - M`I 5`Persec ution ` Four Y ears of M I5 Persecut ion Post s on I nternet Newsgr oups Four Years of "MI5 Persecution" Posts on. Internet Newsgroups For. approximately the first three years of the MI5 persecution, from June 1990 until late 1992,. I kept as quiet as possible, in the hope that by not reacting, MI5s. interest in me would decrease and they would simply go away of their own accord. This is the. sort of behaviour some people employ against bullies; if the bullies arent getting a reaction, then. they might simply go away and victimize. someone else. Unfortunately, this tactic didnt work. The. quieter I became, the more shrill and hysterical the noise from the. Security Service operatives. For about two years I didnt watch TV news at. all. Yet this only heightened their. obsessed fixation; they continued to follow me wherever I went, they continued to induce harassment at. work by managers and fellow workers, and they continued to encourage me to commit suicide. They seemed to. regard my refusal to react as a crime which they would have to "put right" by. ever more. extreme forms of abuse. Finally, in 1995, I changed tactics radically. Since late 1994. I had had accounts with internet providers in. Ontario, Canada. I discovered the cornucopia of internet newsgroups, on every topic from. consumer electronics, to politics. and legal topics, and I discovered online services such as Compuserve and AOL. In. May 1995, I made the first posting to the conspiracy newsgroup, on. the subject of "BBCs Hidden Shame". BBC's Hidden. Shame The internet newsgroup discussion,. which has now reached its fourth anniversary, started with an. article in alt.conspiracy, which I reproduce here. Date: Thu May 4. 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject:. BBC's Hidden Shame Remember the two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The ones. which watched you back? Which you could never get rid of, only the sound. could be turned down? Well the country which brought Orwell into the world has made his. nightmare follow into the world after him. Since 1990 the. British have been waging war against one of their own citizens using surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign. of abuse in the transmitted media in their efforts to humiliate. their "victim". And the most remarkable thing. about it is that what they do is not even illegal - the UK has no laws to protect. the privacy of its citizens, nor does it proscribe harassment or abuse except in the case. of racial abuse. A lot of people in England know this to. be going on, yet so far they have maintained perfect "omerta"; not a. sound, not a squeak has escaped into the English press, and for all. the covert harassment absolutely nothing has come out into the public domain. Have the British gone. mad? I think we should be told At this point, I did not name MI5 as my persecutors. I was. still unsure that they. were the ones responsible for the "psychological terrorism". In followup posts however I did name them;. and the persecutors have never denied the claim; so I think. my guess is valid. (The Security Service Tribunal in 1997. have said "no determination in your favour was made", but it is a well established fact that MI5. lies routinely to the Tribunal which has never found. in favour of a plaintiff, so no conclusions can be drawn from. this.) This first post was made to alt.conspiracy,. but further posts were made to the UK-local newsgroups, in particular uk.misc but. also uk.legal and uk.politics. (which is now called uk.politics.misc). Some time ago I tried to take the battle. to the Compuserve forums, UKPOLITICS (which is now called UKCURRENT -. current affairs), but my articles were censored by the forum operators.. Such censorship is impossible on the internet newsgroups. Police. Refuse to Act I have complained several times to. the Metropolitan Police, who have each time refused to. help. From: Green. <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't. the British Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To:. Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Apr . 7 21:13:30 1996 In. article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> . bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: >Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police. station in London and spoke to >an officer about the. harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible >evidence;. what people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and >without something to support my statements I cannot expect a. police officer to >take the complaint. seriously. This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in. for you. The old bill operates on extremely tight spending. limits forced on them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they often have higher priorities. than chasing something that cannot go. to court. I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but. they probably realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met always stays. away from anything that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret. service interest already, because they realise that they are below these government agencies in. the general pecking. order. If. I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they would show me. the door without even looking at my evidence, because that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before. he retires doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather. deal with the lost dogs and driving. licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss off home at the end of his shift than have. some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and getting him a. bollocking. In short,. you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that saying about the. enemy of your enemies. Most recently, I wrote in March 1999 to Charing. Cross Police Station CID. They did not acknowledge. or reply to my letter. When I phoned them up, the detective Id written to treated me to a. sadly not unusual display of police bigotry, with an uneducated rant. about "your paranoid rubbish". It would be nice to think that such uneducated bigotry is something. other than wholly typical. of police behaviour, but unfortunately that is an illusion that is rapidly. dispelled. Uncorruptible Jon Snow. of Channel Four News From previous articles the reader will know what I think. Jon Snow has recently been watching me while he. reads Channel Four News in the evening. Recently I digitized a. few moments of one such broadcast, where his. face twists into a smile, without there being anything in the news broadcast to cause merriment. Here is a usenet post from some time. ago on MI5s "bought and paid for" tools in the so-called. "free" press. Peter Harding. (harding@ermine.ox.ac.uk) wrote: :. I was at speakers' corner on Sunday. There was one chap who was bellowing : about. something or other, I don't know what, but one thing he said to : someone caught. my ear: : "BBC, MI5, same. thing." Can't. disagree with that sentiment. Wasn't it documented. that MI5 sometimes "bought" journalists and broadcasters? I remember reading. a report by some jouralist who had been offered an extra tax-free income by MI5. to become their covert mouthpiece, and had refused. ............................................................................. > : >mouthpiece,. and had refused. >. : > : It was Jon Snow of. Channel 4. > > Was it reported in any of the. papers? It has been reported several. times. The most recent was in Private Eye, a few months back. As I recall they also wanted. information from him; journalists. would be a natural choice for members of the Security Service and the Secret Intelligence Service for information. sources. > It might be interesting to see what he. had to say regarding their > attempt. to recruit him. He was most concerned that many others. would have accepted such an offer. However, we can. probably make an educated guess as to some of those who accepted:. Nigel West (Rupert Allason, MP) and Chapman Pincher would come near to the top. of the list. -- \/ David Boothroyd. Socialist and election analyst. Omne ignotum. pro magnifico. British Elections and Politics. at http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html I wish I was in North Dakota. Next General Election must be before 22nd May. '97 The House of Commons now : C 324, Lab 272, L Dem 25, UU 9, PC 4, SDLP. 4, SNP 4, UDUP 3, Ind. 1, Ind UU 1, Spkrs 4. Government majority = 1. Telephone Tate 6125. Corrupt Security Service. agents steal millions from taxpayers Money is of course a factor in the grand equation. which is the MI5 persecution. It costs money for the. Security Service to "buy" people in the media etc. But that is only a. small part of their expenditure of taxpayers resources. Most of. the expenditure is directly on the salaries if the agents involved; and in this. post I put forward the theory that MI5 are trying to draw out their involvement for as long. as possible, very cynically, to maximise their income and line their. own pockets. At each stage they. have tried to pretend that I am something out of the ordinary. Either I was very stupid. ("he's an idiot") or very clever ("he's like a genius"). Either I was a threat to Western civilization (Levin once referred to me as. the next Hitler) or I. was completely defenceless ("a soft toy"). Now, it should be. obvious to any person with common-sense that I am not out of the ordinary. in any way. I have an IQ which is average for the Web, I am racially white European, and there are. plenty of other people with schizophrenia or epilepsy out there who. haven't been targeted for MI5 attention, so why me? I think the answer is that the MI5 agents. who harass me have cynically exploited the situation by painting me as extraordinary in order to. assure themselves of well-paid employment funded by the ordinary British taxpayer. To put it. bluntly, they are stealing millions of pounds from the taxpayer. to feed their own pockets. This assertion is supported by the observation that it's the same agents. who are doing the harassment. Six months ago in a local hospital. I was harassed by someone whose face I had. seen (he had stared straight at me aggressively, at the time I just thought it was some nutter but it turns out he was. one of "them") aboard a KLM flight a couple of years ago. It's presumably been the same people most of the time. I've. seen the way contractors act. when they don't want their positions terminated. Would these agents really want to lose. their well-paid employment harassing me? Presumably they are promising their bosses a "breakthrough" (ie my. demise) real-soon-now and have been for the last seven years, while all the while these MI5 agents skim. millions off. the taxpayer. I wouldn't mind a job like that. Perhaps if I persecute myself a little. bit, like standing. in front of a mirror and shouting mindless obscenities, do you reckon I'd get a slice. of the caky Service Tribunal. This year Nick Brooks, current Tribunal Secretary, confirmed to me that he could not. think of a single case where. the Tribunal had found in favour of a complainant. Here is my usenet post from. two years ago. Subject: MI5: "It wasn't. us" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal Organization: Toronto. Free-Net "The Security Service Tribunal have now investigated. your complaint and have asked me to inform. you that no determination in your favour has been made on your. complaint." Signed ER. Wilson, Tribunal Secretary Well that's a relief then. All. that spamming for nothing eh. Gaw blimey, if they say they're not. doing it then it can't be them, can it? In a. recent letter to Mr Brooks I expressed the opinion that the Tribunal were unable to fulfil. their responsibilities in the face of MI5 falsehoods. Nevertheless, I. do intend to make another complaint to the Tribunal in the near. future, despite the Tribunal appearing to be a toothless. watchdog. Discrimination against. a Unit Minority MI5 have been very clear in their instructions as to what. I should do. They have openly shouted at me the word "suicide", and also. from the other abuse it is clear that they. want my existence terminated. This point is covered in more. detail in a previous article. The following post. describes the xenophobic nature of MI5s campaign against me. They have refined their bigotry down to a unit minority, yet they make. use of the discrimination against the mentally ill which is a feature of. current British. society. Subject:. Re: MI5 says "Kill Yourself" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.media References:. <zlsiida.4248.3258FE24@fs1.mcc.ac.uk> <53eeev$cmg@axalotl.demon.co.uk> Organization: Toronto. Free-Net Distribution: iain@hotch.demon.co.uk (Iain L M Hotchkies). wrote: >Indeed. If. you've ever had a 'conversation' with someone suffering >from florid schizophrenia, you'll know. how difficult it can be to >'argue' with. them. I don't have. florid symptoms. But I'm in a difficult situation, because those people who don't know, aren't going to believe, and those who do, they just. go along with the. crowd. It's never a good idea to go against the grain, and the grain here is defined by interests in the establishment and. the media. Even people who could say out loud what was. happening won't, because then there's a risk that they'll be seen as traitors and. ostracised. Usually this type of 'hidden abuse' is racial and. targetted at a racial minority within a country. You keep the minorities. out of the good jobs, but you don't admit. discrimination exists. It happens everywhere, not just in Britain. The persecution that is going on now is in. reality a refined form of racism. Instead of "nigger" it's "nutter", and abusing the mentally. ill is still socially acceptable today.. In 50 years it might not be, but today there isn't any social. or legal sanction against it. So really they've refined racial harassment down to. a minority of one. The words may be different, but. the methods are the same. 3819 Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93592
  - 5
    - M-I 5`P ersecution ` MI 5 Waste Ta xpayer Million s on Point less Hat e-Campaign MI5 Persecution Update: Friday. 30 April, 1999 If You Intend To Reply,. Please Read This Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or. two will be. deleted without being read. Somewhere between. 0 and 100% The last few. days there have been no clear recordable instances of abuse. However, while travelling. on the Underground, while walking around near. my home and going to friends homes, I am constantly troubled by thoughts that those people over there might be about to. get at me; that the couple sitting in the opposite seats laughing are in fact. laughing at me; et cetera, et. cetera. A comment by a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in. my mind. He described the possible scale of the. epidemic as "between 0% and 100%". It might not be. happening, it might not happen at all, to any discernable degree.... or. it might be total. Without clear recording, which seems to have become impossible the last couple of weeks, there. is no way of knowing whether the harassment really is continuing, whether. we have entered. a temporary hiatus, or whether perhaps it has perhaps stopped for now. But. for the time being I think there arent any reasons to dicontinue these faxes. I only re-started them six weeks ago. in response to a resumption of MI5 harassment; and I think I will need to be more convinced of absence. of persecution before I discontinue. my complaints. The Newscasters are still. watching In the last few weeks there have been at least a couple of. fairly overt instances of "interactive watching" by newscasters.. I reported this in a previous. "MI5 Persecution Update". These instances are really very rare compared to 1990-91,. when there were many dozens of such occurrences. Undoubtedly the reduction is due to. my practice of videotaping everything I see. Recently I. had the opportunity of showing this years "happenings" (Jon Snow/Nicholas Witchell) to. my psychiatrist, and he agreed that in both cases the newscasters. were expressing merriment. without visible cause, and that objectively it might be possible for. my claims to be true - although of course other people reported similar. thoughts to him, and this thinking is usually a symptom of. illness. Read About the MI5 Persecution on the. World Wide Web The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine reviews. the website describing it as an "excellent site". Since August. 11, 1996 over 50,000 people have browsed this. website. You are encouraged to read the. web pages which include a FAQ (frequently asked questions) section outlining the nature of. the persecutors, their methods of harassment. through the media, people at work and among the general. public an evidence section, which carries audio and video clips. of media and workplace harassment, rated according to how. directly I think they refer to me objective descriptions of the state. security agencies involved scanned texts of the. complaints I have made to media and state security agencies. involved posts which have been made to netnews over the last. four years on this topic Keith Hill MP. (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever refuses to. help. MI5. Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign Recently I was talking to an independent observer about. the nature and purpose of the perceived campaign of. persecution against me. The person I spoke to, a highly. intelligent man, said he was struck by the utter pointlessness of the perceived campaign against me. He. also said that, if my theories were. in fact true, many people would have to be involved, in the surveillance itself, and. in the technical side of the delivery of information from my home to TV. studios for example, if the "interactive watching" were happening as. described. He voiced these thoughts without any prompting from me; but both I and other observers. had arrived at pretty much the same conclusions, some years. ago. I saw a team of four men at. Toronto Airport in 1993 To carry out the surveillance alone,. full-time, would employ four or five men, or their equivalent in terms of man-hours. Each man. would "work" an eight-hour shift, so you would need at least. three men doing the surveillance, plus a connecting link / manager. An indicator that. this estimate is correct arrived in. 1993, when I was accosted by one of a group of four men at Toronto. Airport; he said, laughing, "if he tries to run away well find him". Plainly these were the. men who had been involved in the intrusive. surveillance of me for the preceding three years. On other occasions, I have seen the same man. on two or three occasions. On one such occasion, at Ottawas Civic. Hospital in November 1996; he gave his name to the doctor. as "Alan Holdsworth" or some such; my hearing is not very good sometimes and. I am not sure of the surname, although I am sure "Alan". was his first name. I saw exactly the same man again in Ottawa, at the airport, in July 1998. Obviously, other. people must be "working" with this person; he would not be the sole agent employed in. this case. Usenet readers views on the Cost to MI5 of Running the. Campaign Here's what a couple. of other people on internet newsgroups / Usenet (uk.misc) had. to say regarding the cost of running such an operation... PO: >Have. some sense, grow up and smell reality. What you are talking about PO: >would take loads of planning, tens of thousands of. pounds and lots of PO: >people involved in the planning, execution and maintenance of it.. You PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself to think you. are worth it. and...... PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize. how much it would cost to keep PM: >one person under continuous surveillance. for five years? Think about PM:. >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two man team and a PM: >supervisor.. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in shifts --. so it would PM: >be six men at #20,000 (which with. on-costs would work out at more like PM:. >#30,000 to the employer.) PM:. > PM: >So, we're. talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor. #220,000.. Then you've got the hardware involved. And PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think the. 'Big Boss' PM: >would listen to hours and hours of tapes, do. you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in all, you. couldn't actually do the job for much less than PM: >a quarter million a. year. Over five years. What are you doing that makes PM: >it worth the while. of the state to spend over one and a quarter million PM:. >on you? Those are pretty much the sort of calculations that went through my. head once I stopped to consider what it. must be costing them to run this operation. At the very least, a quarter million a. year - and probably much more,. given the intrusive and human-resource-intensive methods employed. Times nine. years. Equals well over two million pounds - and probably much, much. more. Its wasteful. for someone with my skills to be unemployed The wastefulness of the MI5 campaign. against me is not just that of futile expenditure on their side. It. is also extremely wasteful for someone with my talents to be unemployed. and on a disability pension. I am highly qualified in. numerate disciplines, yet am unable to work, specifically because of the MI5 hate-campaign against me. It is a terrible. waste of resources for a supposedly efficient economy like that. of the UK to be squandering. the talents of a skilled and capable worker. I made every effort to remain in employment. for as long as I could, but ultimately I was defeated by MI5s employment of. massive resources specifically targeted on my workplaces with the. sole aim of seeing me evicted from those. workplaces. You might expect this sort of behaviour from the Stasi or some other. secret police force in a communist country where labour is cheap, and. the governments aim on seeing its citizens confined; but for a. supposedly free and efficient economy like Britains, the wastefulness resulting both directly and indirectly from. the Security Services activities is. simply criminal, and should never be allowed. The international dimension means the costs are multiplied many. times overoer had any. sense, then they have surely taken leave of them over the last. nine years. Four years of persecution in. Canada The persecution re-started within less than five minutes of. my arrival in Canada, as documented above,. and in the "frequently asked questions" article on the website. The words, "if he. tries to run away well find him" spoken by one of the harassers at Toronto. Airport are now imprinted on my. mind. A year later I emigrated to Canada, intending. to find a job and settle there, hoping that MI5s interest in me might dim with. time. I did manage to find work there, but my hopes of avoiding. Security Service interest were ground into dust.. As detailed above, I saw the same man in November 1996 and July 1998, both times in. Ottawa. Apart from these encounters, there were numerous. incidents between 1994 and 1998 of harassment, of an identical nature and in most cases using identical. words to what had occurred in the UK. It became quite clear to me that. the permanent surveillance and harassment operation which MI5 had subjected me to. in England was. being continued. For a team. of four or five men to be employed overseas must cost a lot more than if they operate in their home country.. And for MI5 to continue the operation for a period of over four. years, continuously, must cost many hundreds of. thousands of pounds. This confirms my belief that the state is. funding the campaign against mehat the Security Service receives current annual funding of #160M. Divided by. 1850 staff, works out at #86,000. But the unit annual cost of each "watcher" must be much. higher than this, especially given the. frequently mobile and overseas nature of their actions of. the last few years. A very conservative figure might be a little over #100,000 pa for each of a team of five people, or. half a million pounds per year.. For nine years, so far. So the most conservative estimate of the surveillance. element alone is perhaps four or five million pounds since. 1990. This guesstimate is of course theoretical - I am not privy. to inside details of how MI5 split their funding. But. to take some other examples, the cost of. a US counter-surveillance specialist per day is USD 5,000. Even. if the agents permanently assigned to me are not of this calibre. - even if they employ specialists when difficult work planting bugs etc is encountered. - their salary and support costs must still be very. high. The individual agents are doing well for themselves as they are well-paid to. exercise psychopathic instincts which in any sane society would see them in prison; but the. taxpayers who must fund this terribly wasteful exercise are being "done" out of. hundreds of thousands of pounds each. year. It must be emphasised that the above estimates. are highly conservative. Besides the surveillance operation, it must carry. a high cost in man-hours to propagate covert. slanders through the population; to setup and maintain the "interactive watching" links. to TV and radio stations, which. these organisations continue desparately to "lie and deny"; and to induce antipathy in co-workers. which would not otherwise exist. Why they are wasting Millions of Pounds on. a "Nobody from South London" As remarked in the prologue to this. article, it is really most extraordinary that. the Security Service spends a chunk of its budget, every year for. nine years so far, on a meaningless campaign against a "nobody from South London".. That they are spending such a large amount of money has been confirmed. to me on several occasions, usually by oblique references to. "its costing this country millions". The supposed "logic" behind the persecution. is that MI5 wish to avoid their harassment of me, and the involvement of the UK media,. to be made public; yet as the reader will appreciate that is a circular argument, "theyre. doing it because they want. to keep it secret and avoid humiliation for themselves and their country" begs the question, "why did they. start doing it in the first place?", to which in truth I myself do not know the. answer. Plainly MI5 with its rich. budget can afford half a million pounds a year to waste on a "nobody from South. London". Some time ago I was talking to a British. surveillance professional on Compuserve who told me "this work costs a lot of money and. is usally because the person I am following has done something (usually criminal) to warrant all this money. and time being spent." Yet in this particular. case it is plainly not the "victims fault". that the harassment is taking place. The hate-campaign against me is completely the creation. of the obsessive psychologies of the MI5 agents who have made themselves my persecutors;. it is obviously a "personal" campaign for them,. and for years they misuse taxpayer funding to feed their insane,. unnatural and fixated fantasies. 2349 Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93591
  - 6
    - M.I 5-Persec ution ` Comparin g the MI5 Persecu tion with Ger man Fi nal Solutio n MI5 Persecution. Update: Friday 16 April, 1999 If You Intend To. Reply, Please Read This Please.... keep your response to. one page!. Faxes over a page or two will be deleted without. being read. BBC newscaster Nicholas Witchell cant. stop himself laughing During. 1990-91 there were very many instances of "interactive television" where newscasters and other TV presenters saw. on a screen before them what was happening in my home,. and reacted, frequently by laughing at me. During. this period I unfortunately did not record these programmes.. For the last year or two, I have been recording everything I watch, and there has been a drastic decrease. in such incidents. However, on occasion,. television presenters do still engage in "interactive. watching" and react to what they see. This has been evident with Jon Snow. of Channel Four News recently - a particularly interesting case, since it has been established. that he cannot be corrupted by money (it is. well-documented that MI5 offered him a tax-free salary and he turned them down). I wonder what device MI5. are using to encourage him to do the "interactive. watching"? On Saturday. 10 April 1999 at 7pm, Nicholas Witchell on BBC2 News reacted when he saw that I was watching. the programme, and I have his reactions stored safely on videotape. I have watched this tape several times and. I am entirely confident that my evaluation of his reactions is correct.. For several minutes his upper lip quivered in mirth. as he attempted to keep a straight face. Then finally his self-control evaporated through. the excuse of a. weak joke and his face collapsed into a grin. The strange. thing is that I dont know why he was laughing at me, what I had done recently to "deserve" to be laughed at.. The MI5 persecutors usually manage to invent some justification as to why. people should laugh at and/or abuse me. ("hes an X", "it was so funny" etc), so Mr Witchell could have been laughing for any number of reasons.. Perhaps he found the views I. have been expressing in these articles amusing? I suppose if youre paid enough money. and ordered to laugh then even the most innocuous thing becomes. funny. Jon Snow of Channel Four. News cant stop himself smirking, either. On 12. February 1999 I was watching Channel Four News presented by Jon Snow. As usual, I was recording the programme, so that. if anything out of the ordinary happened, Id. be able to go back and watch it again. Now, Jon Snow, by his own claim,. is uncorruptible. He says he turned down an offer. of a substantial tax-free salary from MI5 - they wanted to make him. their mouthpiece, and he told them where to get off. So you will. be most surprised to learn that Jon Snow "interactively watched". me that evening, and on many other evenings. Approximately fifteen minutes. into the programme, he announced that the US President would be making a live. appearance at about 7.30pm; I looked at the clock on the mantelpiece; and Snow saw me looking. at the clock, and visibly tried. to suppress a smirk. Uncorruptible, are. you, Mister Snow? If not money, then why are you watching me, Mister Snow? Are. they forcing you to watch me? Cant you turn the monitor off, Mister. Snow? Keith. Hill MP (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever refuses to. help. Comparing the MI5 Persecution. with German "Final Solution" It might seem. offensive to compare the mass murder of millions of civilians in wartime with the peacetime. persecution of merely one person. Yet the comparison has been coursing through. my mind for several years now,. because the brutality of German intent to "sub-humans" is very much comparable to the. brutality of British intent to someone they vituperate and term "not up to British standards". The. methods may differ, but the. persecutors mindset is the same. The Germans first targeted the mentally. disabled, too During WW2 millions of. ethnic Russians, Poles, Jews, mentally ill, gypsies and other minorities were rounded up and murdered in. purpose-built camps by the German regime, in the. name of "racial superiority". Fifty years on, the British Secret Police,. MI5, instituted a campaign of mass hysteria; but in their cowardice, limited their activities. to one single victim. It is instructive to note that the early. German "cleansing" effort was directed primarily not at Jews, but. at the mentally ill. The Nazis set up the. T4 project in the thirties to "cleanse" away 70,000 mentally disabled people,. including schizophrenics and epileptics. After WW2 the Jews with their media. influence used the reaction from the holocaust to roll back anti-semitism in the Western countries; however, the. mentally ill are today still a. persecuted group in the modern Western world as they were under the Nazis (the current Jewish home secretary in the UK intends. to bring. in laws for incarceration without any criminal charge for some mentally ill people - he protects. his own minority, but does nothing for the other minorities in todays society), and this continuing. bias forms a central cause for the current acts of persecution. in the UK. Widespread knowledge of what is happening to. the "un-British" minority In both the German persecution of the thirties and early. forties, and the current British persecution,. many, many people are well aware of whats happening. There is widespread complicity. through inaction of populace; and in a. substantial proportion of the mainstread population, the persecution had/has. widespread enthusiastic support; yet in both the German case in the 1940s. and the British today, the existence of persecution is a mass secret which must be never admitted out loud.. In the recent. Lawrence case this "secret bigotry" has been termed "institutionalised racism", and that is a very good word. for what the British are. doing today The persecutory attitudes and omerta regarding them are so deeply ingrained in the national. psyche that they define the national. mood During WW2 many Germans knew minorities were disappearing, and. through inaction quietly. condoned their government's mass murder of "un-German" minorities and inferior. "foreigners"; and in the 1990s, similarly, many English people know what the. MI5 British Secret Police have been doing, and not only condone it, but actively. take part, because of xenophobia against the "un-British". unit minority that is the target of "British" actions. This attitude by the British persecutors has been. made explicit through the words "he's not up to. British standards"; the British seem to have found their very. own "untermenschen" to victimise. Why these obsessive "holy wars". happen This type of aggression occurs when the majority is threatened. or humiliated in some. way, economically, militarily or culturally. In pre-WW2 Germany the. threat was primarily economic and military, following Germany's humiliating defeat in the first world war and. the reparations it was forced to pay. In modern Britain, one. might guess that the majority English who are. behind the persecution feel pressured by the swiftly diminishing status of Britain. in the world, and the rapidly increasing coloured colonisation of their country,. which in time will see the ethnic English a minority in their. own land, and their more antisocial elements, unable. to reply to the obvious threat, instead project their aggression onto another,. weaker, unit minority In both cases there is a whiff of "holy war" or. irrational obsession with the persecution. Certainly the German behaviour fifty. years ago bordered on the not-quite-sane, and the. current British behaviour towards their chosen victim is strongly tinged with a leave-taking. of reason. And the choices. open to the victims are the same, since MI5 will never allow me to escape them, "if he tries to run away we'll find him", just. like the commandant of Auschwitz telling the new arrivals, "the only. escape is through the. chimney". The Victim Will Destroy Us if We Dont Destroy. Him First The persecutors propaganda. is the same. Fifty years ago the Germans said, "if. we don't do it to the Jews then the Jews will do it to us"; and MI5's propaganda in the early nineties concentrated. on their victim as a "monster" aesome. "untermenschen" minority. "We are decent fellows" say. the Brutal Persecutors During. the course of researching this article I read part of the very interesting book, "Hitler - A Study. in Tyranny", by Alan Bullock. This volume contains a quote from. Himmler on the "Final Solution"; "Most of you know what it means when a hundred. corpses are lying side by side, or five. hundred or one thousand. To have stuck it out, and at the same time. .... to have remained decent fellows, that is what has made us hard. This is. a page of glory in our history which has never been written and is never to be. written." In. the MI5 persecution, too, there is a thread of deliberate brutality to the sick and vulnerable,. while the persecutors maintain that "we are decent fellows".. There is almost a conscious schizophrenia in the self-attitudes of the Security. Service operatives and those in the public who they employ against me, which reflects the contradiction. evident in the German attitude above.. On the one hand, they stoop to the lowest and most base behaviour; yet at the same time, the MI5 operatives. tell themselves that since they are civilised. British people, then surely they must by definition be "decent fellows". Any indecency is. made the fault of the victim; "hes making us persecute him, so we need. feel no guilt". Yet the conduct is atypical of the. way these peoples see their normal modes of behaviour. Befslaughter was. not typical of normal German behaviour up to that point.. Similarly, the current MI5 abuse goes against the grain of British self-image as being "reserved" and "decent",. since they are using terms of abuse which are common among blacks. and other supposedly less-developed races, but not among. the English. Conclusion The ultimate aim of both persecutions is. the humiliation and physical extinction of the persecuted group. The Germans did this in. a very direct way; the British Secret Police MI5. are acting indirectly and relying on self-extinction of their target,. because in peacetime and in the current somewhat false. climate of "political correctness" more direct methods are impossible. If MI5. undertook more direct action the mass "omerta" would be broken. I have written this. article with sincerity to show how a historically recent persecution in another country parallels what. is being done in this country today. In. both cases, the evil-doers are of their countries establishments, and rely on widespread tacit support. to maintain the persecution. and omerta around it. While the holocaust was undoubtedly the greater evil, it is important to. be aware of the fact that had the Germans not. been defeated fifty years ago, their plans would have gone through to total. completion. In Britain today no force threatens the "permanent government" of which. the Security Service forms a part; and it looks very unlikely that the wrongs perpetrated by the MI5. secret police will ever be revealed to public. view, and the British secret state brought to justice for its. evil actions. 879 Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93590
  - 7
    - ms crm laptop client installation error hi members, This is anil and new to crm installation part i installed crm server,Active directory and Exchange server in different machines but all these are in the same domain,now when iam trying to install ms crm laptop client i am getting a warning when installation is checking all the requiremets "the warning message is "setup cannot connect to ms crm server.This might indicate that the server is down" i pinged all the servers all are pinging, but iam unable to resolve this issue can any one help me getting out of it Thanx in advance................... Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93589
  - 8
    - incident navigation bar hi, I can hide the left navigation bar items in the incident form. But the white space of navigation area is still there. Is there a way to remove this white space? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93586
  - 9
    - CRM 4.0 - Customizations Warning I am running CRM 3.0 Update 2 and everything works great. We have about 6 custom entities and a lot of customizations. When I run the CRM 4.0 install, I get the following warning: "Setup has detected customizations in your current system that have not been published. If you continue, these customizations will be lost. To save these customizations, you must exit Setup and then publish the customizations." Problem is, the customizations HAVE been published and they work fine. What's going on here? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93582
  - 10
    - Service Products Tracking. We run a workshop repair service, what is the best way to track customers products, as it seems unfeasible to add products when booking an over the counter repair order in CRM. I would like to track repairs against machine manufacturer to do simple reporting like reliability against brand etc. Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93575
  - 11
    - Form Assistant - default to contact not account hi We are using the campaign response form to enter responses. On the customer field the form assistant lookup defaults to Account. I want this to default to the contacts entity. can someone please advise me how i could go about this please. thanks heaps Ridhima Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93570
  - 12
    - dead hard drive or is it video? I turned of my computeras usual, but when I went to turn it on again, only the fans came on. I can feel activity in the hard drive and it seems to click on and then off...no signal imput to my screen. Can I use it on my friends computer as a secondary hd to try to retrieve my data? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93566
  - 13
    - calculate number of days between two dates I have a simple scenario. If the ratified contract date is blank, then calculate the number of days from contract offer date to todays date, otherwise, calculate the number of days from contract offer date to contract ratified date. Here is my attempt a the code I am trying to make work, but the conditional statement doesn't appear to work and then doesn't calculate the correct number of days: // set variables var contractofferdate = crmForm.all.hbw3_contractoffer.DataValue; var contractratifieddate = crmForm.all.hbw3_contractratifieddate.DataValue; // determine if ratified date is blank if((crmForm.all.hbw3_contractratifieddate.DataValue != null) { // calculate contract offer days from today's date var now = new Date(); crmForm.all.hbw3_contractofferdays.DataValue = (now - contractofferdate) / 86400000 } else { // calculate final contract offer days from offer date to ratified date crmForm.all.hbw3_contractofferdays.DataValue = (contractratifieddate - contractofferdate) / 86400000 } Any help on making this work is GREATLY appreciated. Regards, Don Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93565
  - 14
    - Data Migration Manager for CRM 4.0 I have just successfully installed CRM 4.0 and life is good. My next mission was to install the data migration manager and attempt my first data migration from another system. I was able to get the tool installed, but immediately ran into the error: The Data Migration Manager encountered an error while setting up the temporary migration database. After reading the readme file, I deleted the UserReplicationID from the registry as it advised. I restarted the Data Migration Manager and still get the same message. Does anyone have any insight into what other factors might contribute to this error? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93561
  - 15
    - Los Angeles Movers Moving Services Company in California Los Angeles Movers Moving Services Company in California Free Moving Estimate, Local Movers, Long Distance Moving, Packing Supplies, Storage Rental, Home Moving, Apartment Moving, Office Moving, Commercial Moving, Moving Companies in your area. Furniture Boxes moving Los Angeles call 323-678-2704 GET FREE QUOTES from professional moving companies in your area Licensed & Insurance MC 531644 US DOT 1400507 1. Long Distance Moving -Save on your Move 6 or more movers compete for your move. Sit Back and receive calls from Movers who want to compete for your move. http://www.sunshine-mhs.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 2. Compare Movers - Save Money Get free quotes from movers in your area. Save up to 65% off of regular rates! http://www.linksmoving.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 3. Movers Get free estimate from multipl moving companies at the same time, Licensed and Insured. http://www.mover4u.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 4. Moving & Shipping Local, Long Distance Full Moving Service Company, Moving & Shipping Local, Long Distance Moving Cross Country Moving Auto Shipping, All States Moving Services Free Estimate. call 1 (818) 501-3646 http://www.linksmoving.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 5. U Haul Movers - We Haul Moving Company Full Service Moving in your area, Local Movers, Long Distance Cross Country all 48 States Moving, Packing, Labor Loading un Loading. Free Estimate for your up coming move. http://www.movinghaul.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 6. Moving Services - Truck Rentals Complete moving information. Local and long distant moving services. International movers. Budget Truck Rentals. Fast - Reasonable Moving Services... http://www.123movingcompany.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 7. Choosing a Moving Company Article looks at what you should consider when choosing a mover. http://www.movinghaul.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 8. California Movers Call 1-818-439-3474 Full Moving service, Local Movers, Long distance moving, International and auto transport. Call-1-818-439-3474 and get free quote. http://www.mover4u.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 9. Moving Companies - Save $$ Compare Moving Companies - Get Competitive Price Quotes - Free http://www.movinghaul.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 10. Moving Company Home Movers 818-439-3474 National and Worldwide Moving Company, Full Moving Services Long Distance, Local, International. labor, packing crating for home, business and Auto Transporting. http://www.123movingcompany.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 11. The best directory for Mover Check out the best Reviewed sites about Mover. The best Mover portal on the web. Also a lot more Mover related topics and Mover listings. http://www.mover4u.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 12. California World Moving & Storagre California moves, moving, moving company, moving companies, relocation, moving boxes, packing supplies, call 1-818-439-3474 http://www.worldmovingandstorage.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 13. The best directory for Mover Check out the best reviewed sites about Mover. The best Mover portal on the web. Also a lot more Mover related topics and Mover listings. http://www.sunshine-mhs.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 14. Los Angeles Long Distance Moving Los Angeles Long Distance Moving, Moving out of State, Cross Country Moving, Packing Supplies CALL 1 (818) 439-3474 http://www.losangeles-movers.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 15. Los Angeles, CA movers 818-439-3474 Los Angeles, CA movers 818-439-3474 local movers, long distance movers, international movers, full moving services & packing. shipping national & worldwide. http://www.movers2u.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 16. Mover Choose the top 10 sites for Mover now! Find the latest results for Mover at WhosGot.net! http://www.mover4u.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 17. Los Angeles Movers 1-323-678-2704 Full Moving & Packing Services in Los Angeles California, serving local moving, long distance moving, cross country moving, office moving, commercial moving, auto shipping . http://www.movers12.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 18. CALIFORNIA MOVERS 1-323-678-2704 Full Moving & Packing Services, All Local Moving, Cross C ountry Moving & Auto Shipping, Packing Supplies & Moving International call us World Moving & Storage 1-323-678-2704 http://www.movers12.com [domain info] Sponsored Result 19. Los Angeles Moving Company 323-678-2704 All Movers Moving Services, Full Moving, Packing & Storage Services, Long Distance Movers, Cross Country Moving all 48 States. http://www.movers2u.com Sponsored Result 20. All San Francisco Movers 818-439-3474 All San Francisco Movers Moving Services, Full Moving, Packing & Storage Services, Long Distance Movers, Moving out of State or Moving to Florida, Cross Country Moving all 48 States. http://www.movers12.com 21. All San Francisco Movers 310-925-1720 All San Francisco Movers Moving Services, Full Moving, Packing & Storage Services, Long Distance Movers, Moving out of State or Moving to Florida, Cross Country Moving all 48 States. http://www.attnmovingcompanies.com 22. Moving Services Moving Companies and Movers in your area local movers, long distance movers free moving estimate moving supplies, auto transport, oversea moving http://www.movingcompanies.co.il call 818-439-3474 call 323-678-2704 Related sites: Home Improvement http://www.homeimprovementlosangeles.com Locksmith Security Services Home Auto Locksmith http://www.locksmithsecurityservices.com Location: all states Location: nationwide http://www.worldmovingandstorage.com http://www.mover4u.com http://www.123movingcompany.com http://www.movers2u.com http://www.movers12.com http://www.sunshine-mhs.com http://www.movinghaul.com http://www.attnmovingcompanies.com http://www.losangeles-movers.com http://www.locksmithsecurityservices.com http://www.homeimprovementlosangeles.com http://www.linksmoving.com http://www.movingcompanies.co.il http://www.blogmoving.com http://www.losangelesmovingservices.blogspot.com/ Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93556
  - 16
    - Reports Error Hello, On a client computer, in IE when I click Reports I get the following: "Microsoft Error An error has occurred. for more information, contact your system administrator. Try Again or Cancel" Click Try Again. same error. On the server, in IE when I click Reports I get the following: "Microsoft Error An error has occurred. for more information, contact your system administrator. Try Again or Close" Click Try Again. same error. Click Close and the IE tab with CRM closes. This is a new installation. We have CRM, SQL, Exchage installed on the same SBS box. I am not that techie. any ideas? thanks, Michael Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93553
  - 17
    - Change Source Campaign on Invoice and Order I need to change the Source Campaign on an Invoice and an Order but the field is locked. I tried to enable the field on the form but still cannot make changes. Any ideas beyond direct edit of DB? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93551
  - 18
    - IE error when viewing reports Hello. I recently fixed out Reporting Services configuration so that the Reports are now available within CRM, but now when I try to run one, I get one of 2 the Internet Explorer errors of: 1 - Line: 412 Char: 2 Error: 'ClientControllerReportViewerControl' is null or not an object 2 - Line: 262 Char:1 Error: 'HoverImageReportViewerControl_ctl01_ctl01_ctl01_ctl01' is null or not an object Any ideas on how to fix this so I can actually run reports? Any help is appreciated. Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93550
  - 19
    - New installations - Outlook 2007 and CRM 3.0 Help On new installation on windows XP SP2 clients along with Outlook 2007. The installation is going through just fine but when we lauch Outlook 2007, it says it cannot communicate with the CRM 3.0 server. Mailboxes resides on Exchange 2007. We already upgraded our Exchange 2003 server with the latest CRM router that supports Exchange 2007 mailboxes. On the client CRMcore.dll is at 3.0.5300.1361 Thanks in Advance, Eric Sabo Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93549
  - 20
    - Manually launch workflow on all records in CRM 4 ? Hello people, I have a field on the contact records in CRM 4 that I would like to clear. I have made a little workflow, that nicely clears the field on the record and that I can manually call. This works fine. Now: is there a way to manually launch this workflow so that is executed on all records at once and not only to the onces I have selected (and thus are limited to only 250 at a time) ? Many thanks in advance for any suggestions ! Regards, Mav. p.s.: This is the best way to clear a field, right ? Or are there any other suggestions ? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93548
  - 21
    - Fax Integration in CRM 4.0 Hello, CRM 3.0 Small Business Edition had Fax Integration with Windows Shared Fax Services. Is it available in any edition of CRM 4.0? I can't find a single word about it in any guide. Thank you in advance, Jevgenij Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93541
  - 22
    - OnLoad Event Error Hey All, My client is getting an odd error during the Account Form's OnLoad event. There's an extensive amount of JScript code in it, but all was working on the CRM Server during testing, but when the User open's the Account, they receive this Msg: Error: Either BOF or EOF is True, or the current record has been deleted. Requested operation requires a current record. Part of the code queries a filtered view in the CRM db, could it be that some users do not have permissions for this view? Has anyone seen this before? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93537
  - 23
    - Sales contracts Hello, My company provides software development services. I want to add some kind of contract renewal functionality to my corporate CRM System. It should automatically create new opportunity and a quote item when current is expiring. Could you please give advice how to manage automatic creation logic. Should I use workflow or there is some other mechanism? Thanks Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93536
  - 24
    - conditional "business required" field I have 2 fields, A and B Depending on picklist selection from field A, I want field B to be "business required" or not. Is this done with onchange Jscript on field A? What are the CRM events controlling "business required". Is there a list of all CRM supported events? Thanks Paul Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93535
  - 25
    - CRM 3.0 toolbar in outlook not responding Hi, The CRM toolbar in outlook does not repond at all, if i click on any of the buttons they do nothing. The buttons seem to be working but nothing happens once you have clicked them, however when I view the CRM offline data in the tree view it appears fine. This occurred after i went offline, and now i cannot get back online. I am using Windows XP and Office 2003 Professional. Any response would be great. Marc Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93528
- Next
  - 1
    - Dynamic Value in Workflows Hello, I am creating some workflows and I want to set a value in an Account Entity based on a value in the Opportunity Entity. I believe I should be able to use the Dynamic value wizard within Workflow manager - i.e. select Account and the filed and select = and then go to Dynamic Value and select Opportunity and the field that I want the value to inherit on change of status. However when I do this I can only select Account within the Dynamic Value picklist. Any ideas? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93527
  - 2
    - Change Actual Revenue display in Opportunity Can anyone tell me how to change the Actual Revenue display name in Opportunity. This field is on the Close Opportunity screen when you Close an Opportunity. I have located the attribute in Opportunity and change the display name but at the Close Opportunity screen it still states Actual Revenue. Thanks. -- dwoo Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93526
  - 3
    - Remove relationships between custom entity My client created a new custom entity and during the creation process, checked the box for Activities on the Entity form. This automatically created relationships between the custom entity and each activity type so that users can set the Regarding field on their activities. Now, the client would like to remove the relationships between the custom entity and activities so that users cannot relate activities to the custom entity. The Activities checkbox cannot be unchecked on the Entity form. When I try to delete the relationships from the Entity form, I get the error message: "System relationships cannot be deleted." I realize that I could create a new identical custom entity with identical attributes and then transfer all of my data over to it, but this would be fairly time consuming and I was hoping there was an easier way. Does anyone know of a way to delete the relationships between activities and a custom entity after the entity has been created? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93525
  - 4
    - Users cannot create appointments Hi everyone We have recently updated CRM to 3.0. Since the upgrade, everything is working ok but for one little problem. I have users in one particular BU that cannot create appointments. Users in all other BUs do not experience this problem. Also, if a move a user out of this BU, he will be able to create appointments. I have rollup 2 applied. Clues anyone? Thanks! -- GVerreault Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93511
  - 5
    - CRM "signature" in Quick Campaign email Subject Line Using the Quick Campaign wizard to send email messages, the recipients get a "CRM signature" at the end of the subject line (for example: CRM:00020218). Is there any way to get rid of this distracting addition to the subject line? Thank you Jason Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93510
  - 6
    - Date Find on or Prior to Today I need a view that will find records if a date field is "on or before" to today. While "on or before" is an operatior, you can only set this to a specific date. Any ideas on how to make this dynamic would be appreciated. Thanks! Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93509
  - 7
    - Outlook client and web client on same machine Is it possible to use both on the same computer, I have heard from a crm consultant that if both web and outlook are installed on the same computer that you may have issues, can anyone confirm? Thank you Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93507
  - 8
    - Quote Revision Views I have searched far and wide through these forums and every book I have available to me and still no success with this subject. Request: My customer would like to historically view each Quote according to the revision number. Problem: There is no default report or view that has the capability for reverting to an old version of the quote or allowing a comparitive view of the quotes. Is there any out-of-box solution to view all quotes per client? It seems that the only historical view is if the quote is sent out via email to the client. In this clients case they might have several people review and modify the quote and the Sales Manager would ultimately decide which version would be sent to the client for approval. Is there a specific query to the database directly that would allow me to see how many versions are in the table per quote id? Thanks in advance, Jason Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93506
  - 9
    - Best way to access CRM from other locations We have CRM V3.0 installed and initially understood that our other office locations could access CRM via the Web Client. We have since learned that this is an unsupported configuration when the other locations do not reside on our domain. In addition to remote offices, we also have personel who need access while traveling or working from another computer not on our domain. Any suggestions for how to make CRM work in this environment? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93503
  - 10
    - Promoting an Outlook email to CRM Why isn't 'Sent' information saved to the CRM Email activity when I promote an Outlook email to CRM? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93500
  - 11
    - Billable time reports I am very new to this CRM product, but am desperately trying to create a report just showing cases and amount of billable time spent on them. I have read the threads and it should be easy but I cant even find the billed time field! I also note that someone states that CRM automatically calculates all time spent on the case but where is this shown? Sorry for being a CRM virgin! Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93498
  - 12
    - != in Workflow Hello, In writing workflows is there anyway of doing a not equals (!=) i.e. If a picklist is not equal to value4 then do something. Or do I have to use elseif statements an subroutines? Thank you Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93497
  - 13
    - MS CRM Evaluation My company currently uses Domino/Notes. Our sales team is interested in evaluating MS CRM. My question is, would there be any benefit at all for us to install MS CRM for an evaluation if we are not currently using Exchange/Outlook? Any help for this newbie question is appreciated. TM Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93494
  - 14
    - CRM 4.0 Outlook client hangs on folders Hi, We are experiencing problems with the Outlook "online" client. Outlook 2007 starts up just fine and the CRM features seem to work well but when navigating subfolders of e.g. the Inbox the list of messages never loads. The progress thingy that appears when loading is all we get. I ran the client diagnostics and it mentioned that I had many messages in the folders. Yup, that's why a need a tool like Outlook to help me organize them. I have around 3000 messages in my inbox but the same thing happens when selecting another folder. Any and all help would be appreciated. Thanks, Manso Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93493
  - 15
    - Look For field in Cases If you select filtered view of All Cases then use the Look For field to find a customer, it automatically filters out only Active cases - not All cases for that particular customer. Has anyone any suggestions as to either get around it or take out the Active filter. Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93492
  - 16
    - Import Customizations Error Hi All, I tried to import Customizations but I got an error as following: "This attribute map is invalid. The selected attributes should be of the same type. The length of the source attribute and the formats should match. The targe attribute should not be used in another mapping". Therefore, my import wasn't get through. Anyone has any ideas, please let me know and I'd appreciate it. Thanks Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93491
  - 17
    - call workflow How to make a call from workflow in c # or javascript. Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93490
  - 18
    - CRM Workflow demos Hi all I am a project manager, managing the implementation of MS CRM 3.0 into our business . I am attempting to obtain some buy in to the powerful workflow with CRM by showing some basic workflows. Are there any good demo videos out there that i can use? Does anyone have any? Or is just best to create some basic workflows within our own system and demonstrate them. KG Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93488
  - 19
    - CRM Outlook Client Hanging Every so often, Outlook 2003 will hang, and the user will have to kill it via Task Manager. Next time they load Outlook, a message will say something on the lines of a serious error occurred with the CRM PlugIn and it gives you a choice whether to disable it or not. The issues only seem to be happening on recently installed machines as I hadnâ??t had anywhere near the same level of problems with early installs of the CRM clients â?? could this be related to the CRM update Rollup 2.0 or another update for office? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93486
  - 20
    - =?Utf-8?Q?=E2=80=99Send_Direct=E2=80=99_email_issue?= We have an install with CRM Professional installed on a member server of a SBS domain â?? everything seems to working fine except when you try to send an email directly from CRM â?? the email activity is created in the history but no email has been sent. We have checked that we can send emails from the server and ensured the CRM server has been added to the list of computers which can relay through the exchange server. Tried to repair the CRM server and setting the authentication of the Outgoing SMTP server to basic and used the administrator username and password Uninstalled and reinstalled CRM The email just does not seem to be created on the Exchange server â?? doesnâ??t seem to be in the exchange logs â?? and there are no event errors on either server that would indicate what the problem is. Can someone help us with this? Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93485
  - 21
    - CRM 4.0 e-mail to case Hi, Last night I downloaded the 90-day RTM eval and successfully upgraded a copy of our product CRM system to version 4.0 from 3.0 rollup 2. It took a while to complete but went extremely well considering the number of customizations we've made. No errors and everything was perfectly converted. This looks like a very good release. I've read in several places that 4.0 included the possibility to convert e-mail to cases eg in the help "Creating queues for Incoming Cases": "In addition to cases, you can set incoming e-mail messages to be routed to a queue, route all incoming messages, or route only those regarding a Microsoft Dynamics CRM account. In the queue, e-mail messages can be assigned to another queue or user, or converted into a case, opportunity, or lead." Does anyone know how to enable this feature? We are using c360's email to case today and would like to use the built in feature if possible. Thanks, Manso Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93481
  - 22
    - I want to add new Tab for all the entity even for custom entity Hi, I have requirement to add new Tab for all the entity even for custom Entity. In EntityName > Details > Information there are 4 tabs - General, Details, Administration, Notes. How do I add another tab over there? Regards, Chittu Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93478
  - 23
    - Microsoft Dynamics CRM 4.0 available for download http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/Browse.aspx?DisplayLang=en&nr=20&productId=835909D0-A755-41FF-93CD-F5207C609EF5&sortCriteria=date Note that the license keys are valid only for 90 days. Before the 90 days are up you will need a full commercial license. Even so 90 days is a long time to be able to test the solution. ======================= John O'Donnell Microsoft Dynamics ISV Architect Evangelist http://blogs.msdn.com/usisvde Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93477
  - 24
    - How can i add new Tab to the fieldprops.aspx page for an entity Hi , I have a requirement where i have add new tab to do addditional functionality the the field property. Can any one help on this . Regards, Chittu Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93475
  - 25
    - Calling OnChange on OnSave is not saving data Hi, I have zipcode field on screen. I have code written on OnChange which populates the city, state etc. fields (by making callout) as per the entered zipcode. The problem is when I change the zipcode and without tabout if I hit on 'Save' for a form, only new zipcode gets saved but rest information remains old. I am trying to call FireOnChange() for zipcode on OnSave of the form. But its not working either. Calling crmForm.all.zipcode.OnChange() on form OnSave gives me error but works fine. Any help is appreciated. Thanks Monika. Tag: Problem of SubReport Tag: 93471

Hello

I make a report Invoice1 and a sub report Invoice1 Sub-Report.
I modify reports (Invoice, Invoice Sub-Report) of CRM
The subreport contains dataset InvoiceDetails that has a parameter @
CRM_InvoiceID.
At my main report Invoice1 I use control Subreport to display in report
Invoice1 my subreport (same process as in invoice):
I am going into my property subreport object ,in the tab General I choose as
my subreport to show, I click Parameters tab ,I choose my
Parameter CRM_InvoiceID and value as I give him: = Fields!
Invoiceid.value.ToString ().

When I visualize my main report with Visual Studio, it works well.
But now that I download the 2 (main report and in the report) in the CRM.
And I run my main report Invoice1 in the CRM, he dont display my subreport
.

If someone can tell me where is the problem.
Thanks for your help

Top

RE: Problem of SubReport by TylerPeelenMSFT

TylerPeelenMSFT
Thu Jan 03 18:05:01 CST 2008

The first thing that comes to mind: when renaming reports, you need to make
sure that all references to the child report in the parent report have been
updated. I can see a situation where you have a Invoice Sub-Report report in
your Visual Studio project or file system and Invoice1 still points to that
report so everything works ok in that environment. But as soon as you move
the reports to CRM, Invoice Sub-Report is missing and the link breaks.

If that's not the case, then what version of CRM are you developing the
report for?

--Tyler

--------------------
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"WTKDI" wrote:

> Hello
>
> I make a report Invoice1 and a sub report Invoice1 Sub-Report.
> I modify reports (Invoice, Invoice Sub-Report) of CRM
> The subreport contains dataset InvoiceDetails that has a parameter @
> CRM_InvoiceID.
> At my main report Invoice1 I use control Subreport to display in report
> Invoice1 my subreport (same process as in invoice):
> I am going into my property subreport object ,in the tab General I choose as
> my subreport to show, I click Parameters tab ,I choose my
> Parameter CRM_InvoiceID and value as I give him: = Fields!
> Invoiceid.value.ToString ().
>
> When I visualize my main report with Visual Studio, it works well.
> But now that I download the 2 (main report and in the report) in the CRM.
> And I run my main report Invoice1 in the CRM, he dont display my subreport
> ..
>
> If someone can tell me where is the problem.
> Thanks for your help
>
>
>

Top