Matt
Sun May 07 22:32:24 CDT 2006
John,
Was this happening with the inbound replies or the outbound messages?
--
Matt Parks
MVP - Microsoft CRM
"John O'Donnell" <csharpconsulting@nospam-hotmail.com-nospam> wrote in
message news:Olc9%23kNcGHA.2188@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...
Matt
that client in reno had issues with the guids. Their spam tool was blocking
emails with the guid. Although this is the only time I have seen this
happening
=======================
John O'Donnell
Microsoft CRM MVP
http://codegallery.gotdotnet.com/crm
"Matt Parks" <mattp65@Yax_RemoveDashAndX_xhoo.com> wrote in message
news:eA0MqW%23bGHA.3856@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> As you suspect, there is a lot of fear around the GUID causing the
> problem,
> but I am not aware of anyone that has proven that it causes the spam
> filters
> to grab the messages. The modifed token in 3.0 could still cause this
> same
> behavior.
>
> --
>
> Matt Parks
> MVP - Microsoft CRM
>
>
> "geoffm33" <geoffm33@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:B764A960-04BF-4393-B077-0712E7FC0855@microsoft.com...
> How big of a concern is the tracking GUID triggering SPAM rules on remote
> mail servers? We currently use CRM with tracking and have reports of users
> sending email that the recipient claims they never receive.
>
> At this point the claims haven't been verified, we have asked them to
> report
> specific instances so we can investigate. There are several reasons why
> the
> messages could be marked as SPAM besides the GUID, namely content. If the
> message is part of a campaign, then obviously the content would play a
> huge
> role in SPAM rule application.
>
> So, my question is, does anyone have concrete info on the GUID triggering
> SPAM filter rules? This will help in determining what level of reliance we
> will put into the email functionality of CRM.
>
> Thanks!
>
>