John
Mon Jan 26 10:49:14 CST 2004
If you have access to MBS Partnersource then you can post suggestions to the
product team. You can also send suggestions to this group as Microsoft does
monitor the newsgroup.
On future releases I will expect to see things like the ability to have more
control over data entry with phone numbers in a consistent format etc.
Perhaps also duplicate checking.
"microsoft.public.crm" <sales@sanitechinc.com> wrote in message
news:OBgtzmC5DHA.1804@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Thanks for the response Jerry. If MS does address this issue and others
> (not just my peers)
> believe this to be a problem then this my ease our mind as to what
solution
> we choose.
>
> Another issue we don't like is the fact that entering data in named fields
> is not case sensitive
> and I must rely on my sales and service staff to enter information
properly.
> Maximizer Enterprise
> will automatically captialize first and last names which is a nice simple
> feature. Is anything like
> this available from Microsoft yet?
>
> What other small issues like this are going to be addressed? Is there a
> working database of
> issues people would like to see fixed?
>
> Here is some information regarding maximizer enterprise 8 in case you are
> curious, the price
> is great and it even comes with crystal reports.
>
http://www.maximizerconsultants.com/me8info.html
>
> This decision is going to kill me.
>
> Scott
>
> "John O'Donnell" <csharpconsulting@nospam-hotmail.com-nospam> wrote in
> message news:eE0%234TC5DHA.3896@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > At my last company we were using goldmine. Everyone found the MS CRM
> > interface far easier to navigate. I agree with your statement about
having
> > to naviate through multiple screens to see all info for an account etc.
> This
> > is basically a 360 degree view of the customer. Microsoft are aware of
> this
> > point so expect to see it on a later release but what to do in the
> meantime?
> >
> > One of MS CRM's strengths is that it is built on the .NET development
> > platform. Put simply if you have developers on staff it is a
> straightforward
> > process to create addons to the CRM tool. This of course means if there
is
> a
> > feature you cannot do without its possible you can write it yourself.
> >
> > Not every CRM allows that level of flexiblity.
> >
> > Lastly I would question any company that says Pervasive SQL is better
than
> > MS SQL. I would ask them to qualify that statement.
> >
> > Lastly cost - like everything else MS CRM has a price attached to it. If
> > your company will not or cannot afford the cost then of course you have
to
> > look at alternative solutions. Look at Microsoft Business Contact
manager
> > for a low cost CRM for example but keep in mind data cannot be shared
> > between users.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "microsoft.public.crm" <sales@sanitechinc.com> wrote in message
> > news:%231IID1B5DHA.2528@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > Our SMB is in need of a CRM for both sales and service. We have been
> > > talking to several companies and each one
> > > is of course interested in selling us there own different software.
One
> > > particular companies is even a MS CRM distributor
> > > but feels that Maximizer enterprise 8 is a better option. They even
say
> > > that the pervasive backend is far superior then
> > > SQL.
> > >
> > > What were the deciding factors that lead you to choose MS CRM over the
> > > competition. We are looking at Maximizer Enterprise 8,
> > > and MS CRM Sales and Service Pro, with some interest in Accpacs CRM
> > > solution. We currently only run a peer to peer network
> > > and cost is somewhat of an issue. Our main grip about MS CRM is the
> > layout.
> > > Maximizer enterprise 8 has a great layout in
> > > which you can see all information for a particular account on one
screen
> > > instead of having to double click on that account, then
> > > double click on the contact and then double click on that contacts
notes
> > > like the MS CRM solution.
> > >
> > > Any help would be much appreciated.
> > >
> > > Sincerely,
> > >
> > > Scott Robinson.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>