Dear List

I have done a bit of research and found out that the checkbox control
handles the arrow keys on the pocket pc internally. I would love to able to
get access to those items. I have tried an inherited control overriding the
onkeydown event, but it still gets to it internally before I have access to
it. Is there only way to do this to subclass it and catch the messages
myself? I would really like to avoid that if possible.

Could someone please point me in the right direction.

thanks very much

Kind regards
Nathan Franklin

Re: checkbox KeyDown by Chris

Chris
Tue Mar 28 21:07:00 CST 2006

Use an IMessageFilter implementation.

-Chris

"Nathan Franklin" <nathan@tsn.cc> wrote in message
news:e0cmvh$rkv$1@news-02.connect.com.au...
> Dear List
>
> I have done a bit of research and found out that the checkbox control
> handles the arrow keys on the pocket pc internally. I would love to able
> to get access to those items. I have tried an inherited control overriding
> the onkeydown event, but it still gets to it internally before I have
> access to it. Is there only way to do this to subclass it and catch the
> messages myself? I would really like to avoid that if possible.
>
> Could someone please point me in the right direction.
>
> thanks very much
>
> Kind regards
> Nathan Franklin
>



Re: checkbox KeyDown by Nathan

Nathan
Thu Mar 30 00:01:33 CST 2006

Chris,

Thankyou very much!!!

I got working in 1 hour what in 4 hours i couldnt achieve!

Thanks again mate

Nathan

"Chris Tacke [MVP]" <ctacke@don'tspamme.opennetcf.com> wrote in message
news:OvreZ3tUGHA.4792@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Use an IMessageFilter implementation.
>
> -Chris
>
> "Nathan Franklin" <nathan@tsn.cc> wrote in message
> news:e0cmvh$rkv$1@news-02.connect.com.au...
>> Dear List
>>
>> I have done a bit of research and found out that the checkbox control
>> handles the arrow keys on the pocket pc internally. I would love to able
>> to get access to those items. I have tried an inherited control
>> overriding the onkeydown event, but it still gets to it internally before
>> I have access to it. Is there only way to do this to subclass it and
>> catch the messages myself? I would really like to avoid that if possible.
>>
>> Could someone please point me in the right direction.
>>
>> thanks very much
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Nathan Franklin
>>
>
>