Paul
Tue Jul 01 18:08:31 CDT 2008
Sure it will. In the "Windows CE 5.0" case, it always creates a 2.0
application, but you can select Pocket PC 2003 and choose "Device
Application (1.0)", with no problems (and modify that for your Windows CE
device's layout, if you need to).
Paul T.
"chrkon" <chrkon@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6C153F3F-4721-493A-B7E9-9DC265A353FF@microsoft.com...
> Hello Simon,
>
> You are right. CF 1.0 application are running well on most CF 2.0 devices.
> We had developed a special application for industrial measurements with
> the
> CF1.0 and the OpenNETCF framework. The program controls the measurement
> device via RS232 and/or Bluetooth. Many thanks to the programmers of the
> OpenNETCF framework!
>
> Our application is running without any problems on newer Windows Mobile
> Systems. But in both cases the Handhelds are Pocket PCs. It is a big
> difference between PocketPC and WinCE devices. Not only the position of
> the
> main menu (top / bottom)...
>
> But Simon, you are wrong in one issue. VS 2005 can not create CF 1.0
> applications!
> We have made our application with the Visual Studio 2003. And now we will
> use VS2008 for our Desktop software. But for the PocketPC we still use
> Visual
> 2003 because the software must run on the old hardware with the CF 1.0 !
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Christof Konstantinopoulos
> (Germany)
>
> "Simon Hart [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Yes it is possible. Although from a developer story, I can't remember for
>> sure, but I don't *think* the Win CE 5.0 emulators work directly with VS
>> 2003.
>>
>> For your info: you can target CF 1.0 and CF 2.0 apps in VS 2005. VS 2008
>> you
>> can support CF 2.0 and CF 3.5 apps.
>> --
>> Simon Hart
>> Visual Developer - Device Application Development MVP
>>
http://simonrhart.blogspot.com
>>
>>
>> "Amirallia" wrote:
>>
>> > Hi !
>> >
>> > It's possible to run an PocketPC2003 application developped with VS.net
>> > 2003 on a WinCE. net 5.0 device ?
>> >
>> > If not, what can I do ? Must I convert my project to VS.net 2005
>> >
>> > Thanks for you answer!
>> >
>> >
>> >