Sahil
Fri Oct 22 12:24:44 CDT 2004
Yeah, it might be an overkill .. I was just trying to avoid the string
comparisons on the parent fields. XSLT performance in 2.0 is gonna go up by
400%, so I figured XMLizing your logic wouldn't be so bad.
- Sahil Malik
http://www.dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/sahilmalik
Please reply to the newsgroups instead of email so everyone can benefit from
your reply.
"Miha Markic [MVP C#]" <miha at rthand com> wrote in message
news:emIsLEFuEHA.3156@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Hi Sahil,
>
> Isn't this a bit of an overkill? :-)
>
> --
> Miha Markic [MVP C#] - RightHand .NET consulting & development
> miha at rthand com
> www.rthand.com
>
> "Sahil Malik" <contactmethrumyblog@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:u8vpbjEuEHA.3200@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > How about dropping down to XML for this? Then using the XMLDOM to find
the
> > relevant row?
> >
> > - Sahil Malik
> >
http://www.dotnetjunkies.com/weblog/sahilmalik
> > Please reply to the newsgroups instead of email so everyone can benefit
> > from
> > your reply.
> >
> >
> > "Miha Markic [MVP C#]" <miha at rthand com> wrote in message
> > news:%23cyGEIEuEHA.3200@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I guess you are stuck with manual way.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Miha Markic [MVP C#] - RightHand .NET consulting & development
> >> miha at rthand com
> >> www.rthand.com
> >>
> >> "WiZZiX" <wizzix@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
> >> news:DE17B1E4-F7E8-4BC4-9BA6-3067FE93D9C5@microsoft.com...
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > My question is quite straightforward:
> >> >
> >> > How do I get the parent row of a deleted (child) row. If I use the
> > method
> >> > "GetParentRow" of the child then it returns "nothing". I have tried
> > using
> >> > the
> >> > version parameter of the method but without any result.
> >> >
> >> > I probably could use the original value of the deleted row to
> >> > "manually"
> >> > go
> >> > through the parent rows and find its parent but this seems like a lot
> >> > of
> >> > work
> >> > for something as simple as this.
> >> >
> >> > Hoping for a quick answer,
> >> >
> >> > WiZZiX
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>